CMNS 1118 Week 7 Lecture 3

Share

Summary

This video, the third and final for the week, focuses on reviewing and revising bad news messages. It covers five sections: emphasizing the positive, effective passive voice, delivering bad news neutrally and clearly, embedding bad news, and a case study titled 'Balcony Blues.' The instructor provides examples for each section, explaining how to rephrase sentences to be more positive, less accusatory, neutral, or to embed bad news within subordinate clauses.

Highlights

Introduction to Revising Bad News Messages
00:00:00

The video introduces the topic of reviewing and revising bad news messages, outlining five sections (A-E) that will be covered. The first two sections will focus on emphasizing the positive and using effective passive voice.

Emphasizing the Positive (Section A)
00:01:01

This section discusses how to make negative sentences more positive. Examples include rephrasing 'temporarily out of stock' to focus on when the item will be available, and changing 'wasted $10,000' to highlight the achieved sales increase.

Effective Passive Voice (Section B)
00:01:50

This part explains how to use the passive voice to make messages less accusatory. Examples include transforming direct accusations like 'you claimed to have sent' or 'because you opened the packaging' into more neutral passive constructions.

Delivering Bad News Neutrally and Clearly (Section C)
00:05:50

This section focuses on rewriting bad news statements to maintain a neutral tone while still communicating the bad news effectively. Examples include softening a threat about subscription cancellation and politely requesting a better time for questions.

Embedding Bad News (Section D)
00:06:34

The video discusses embedding bad news within a subordinate clause to draw less attention to it, often by emphasizing a positive alternative or outcome. Examples demonstrate how to place the negative information in a less prominent part of the sentence.

Case Study: Balcony Blues (Section E)
00:13:47

This final section presents a case study involving compensation requests for balcony access issues. Several example statements are analyzed for their effectiveness, focusing on avoiding vague language, overly dramatic phrasing, and abrasive tones, while still clearly stating the inability to compensate. The best approach involves acknowledging the request and then logically explaining the inability to provide compensation.

Recently Summarized Articles

Loading...