Summary
Highlights
The preacher addresses a video where Colombian pastors accuse him of copying his doctrine from Filomeno Girard, a claim he denies, stating he learned of Girard in 2014 while receiving his revelation in 2012. He refutes the idea that he doesn't speak Spanish well and defends his theological background.
The preacher explains how he received the revelation of the name during a debate with trinitarians in 2012. Further, he claims that Aníbal Vallejo from Ecuador understood the revelation and was baptized in 2013 by Pastor Armando Rivera. He defends preaching the name of Jesus and explains issues that he has with the views of Filomeno, such as continuing traditions of the Apostolic church while removing Jehovah and Jesus Christ.
The preacher criticizes Julio César Clavijo and Alexander Serrato, accusing them of being arrogant and superficial. He claims that to be a pastor requires an earned degree in Colombia, while he does not fit the mold. Additionally, he claims that these leaders are part of a business who look down on people who do not have money.
The preacher plays clips of Serrato and Clavijo speaking, highlighting what he perceives as mistakes in their Spanish to question their claims of linguistic superiority. He contrasts their dependence on external sources like Google with his reliance on scripture. Then he dives into the views of the pastors on the Old Testament. Specifically, he uses scripture to defend predicating from what God gave him and questions that those that speak bad of his views are qualified to judge.
Responding directly to Julio César Clavijo's arguments about whether to reference 'Jesucristo' vs 'Jesús el Cristo', with different variations of each being the most correct. He emphasizes that relying on outside history as reasons for using a particular term should be discounted. Additionally, he highlights a video that attempts to manipulate his own words to discredit his message.
The preacher uses scripture as proof that his understanding comes from God. He claims that there are anti-Christs in the world preaching false views. He focuses specifically on how to interpret the Bible, with sections on what constitutes an animalistic/diabolical approach. He claims that men should not be adding to or inventing ideology or terms, but to use the terms given by God.
The preacher states the views of the other pastors regarding what should qualify a man of God. Then he goes into depth on biblical analysis of first Timothy and Mateo's first chapter. It also looks at different version of the Bible to interpret the words of Mateo 1-1. It claims the other side is pushing an agenda rather than biblical truth.
The video continues using comparisons within Mateo towards a critique of what the Colombian pastors are preaching. The preacher then analyzes the Greek interpretation from codices to prove that they are using versions of the Bible that suit their needs rather than using biblical versions that are older. Much discussion is focused on the use of a sigma in various Greek translations.
The preacher challenges Luis Polo and Alexander Serrato to a formal debate, that would be strictly scripture based, with no computer or outside assistance. Also, he offers up his thoughts on the trinity based on what he gleans from scripture. He analyzes Colosenses 3:17 with direct comparison to the original text.
The preacher continues a rebuttal of what he has seen presented, saying that it is an antichrist spirit. He then takes aim at a discussion over baptism. Furthermore, he challenges people to analyze the version of the Bible that they are using. Finally, he restates that he only preaches the views that are preached in the Bible.
The preacher urges viewers to share the video to expose the false teachings and to reject man-made versions, and focus on God-given views. He blesses those who are listening and emphasizes the importance of defending the revealed truth. He says that the God of Moses, Isaac, and Jacob is Jesus.