Agnostic Student vs. Christian Apologists

The student questions the conflicting accounts of Judas' death in Matthew and Acts. The apologist explains that historical records are partial and that the accounts can be reconciled with Judas' hanging himself and then falling, resulting in his death.

The student brings up the different genealogies of Jesus in Matthew and Luke, and discrepancies in the Old Testament regarding a king's age at coronation. The apologists address the genealogies by explaining that Like could be using Mary's genealogy.

The apologists argue that the corroboration from different perspectives strengthens the reliability of the Gospels, noting that discrepancies often arise from different viewpoints or times of observation. They highlight the difference between first-person narratives and historical records.

The apologists address the argument that the Gospel authors didn't actually write the Gospels, stating that that isn't true percentage-wise. They emphasize the archaeology and historicity found within the Gospels, including consistent locations and descriptions.

The student questions utilizing scripture infallibly, particularly regarding controversial topics like homosexuality. The apologists emphasize the importance of context when interpreting the Bible, giving the example of a holy kiss. They note that difficult teachings are expected in a divinely inspired text.

The student clarifies their position as a 'Christian leaning agnostic,' expressing doubts about God's existence. The apologists explore the student's doubts, specifically regarding God's commands for genocide in the Old Testament.

The apologists address the command to kill the Amalekites in 1 Samuel, explaining it within the context of ancient Near Eastern culture and arguing it wasn't full genocide. They highlight God's 400 year warning period and connect the judgement to the Amalekites' infanticide and other practices. The apologists then question if God has the right to judge.

The student questions whether God hardened Pharaoh's heart is a logical inconsistently to free will. The apologists point out that there were seven times where Pharaoh hardened his own heart before we read that God hardened Pharaoh's heart.