Skilbeck's Model of Curriculum Development

Share

Summary

This video provides an overview of Malcolm Skilbeck's dynamic model of curriculum development, detailing its five key steps, exploring its strengths and weaknesses, and evaluating its appropriateness for the Philippine education setting.

Highlights

Introduction to Skilbeck's Model
00:00:00

The video introduces Malcolm Skilbeck's model of curriculum development, developed in 1976. This model is known for its dynamic view, meaning curriculum development is non-linear and flexible, allowing educators to start at any point and proceed in any order. The curriculum elements are seen as interactive and adaptable.

Five Steps of Skilbeck's Model
00:01:39

Skilbeck's model proposes five essential steps for effective school-based curriculum development: situational analysis, goal formulation, program building, interpretation and implementation, and monitoring feedback, assessment, and reconstruction.

Details of Each Step
00:02:02

The video elaborates on each step: Situational analysis involves examining internal (student abilities, teacher skills) and external (culture, parent expectations) factors. Goal formulation assigns decision-making roles to teachers, staff, and principals for objective setting. Program building includes selecting content, sequencing learning, staff deployment, and choosing materials. Interpretation and implementation focus on addressing practical problems. Evaluation ensures curriculum reconstruction based on feedback.

Strengths of Skilbeck's Model
00:03:42

The strengths of the model include its realistic and dynamic approach, flexibility in starting any phase, freedom for creativity by avoiding obsession with behavioral objectives, and continuous curriculum reconstruction through evaluation feedback to meet learner needs.

Weaknesses of Skilbeck's Model
00:04:48

Weaknesses highlighted are potential confusion due to its non-sequential nature, leading to a lack of clear direction. Developers may spend a lot of time on discussions to determine where to begin. It also has a perceived lack of emphasis on the clear construction and use of objectives.

Conclusion and Appropriateness in the Philippines
00:05:50

In conclusion, Skilbeck's model is considered a suitable and less dysfunctional approach that allows developers flexibility and creativity. Its inclusion of situational analysis is particularly beneficial in the Philippines, helping to create curricula that are relevant, responsive to learners' needs, and meet global demands.

Recently Summarized Articles

Loading...