🚨URGENT ! MILL’S TSHIBANGU AUX ARRÊTS POUR COMPLICITÉ AVEC KABILA ET NANGAA. PLUS DE 100 000$ SAISIS

The journalist questions why Congolese justice and intelligence services have not acted upon Tshibangu's revelations, given the serious implications of his alleged ties to Kabila and his role in discrediting the government. He emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability concerning Tshibangu’s funding and his true allegiance.

Dou Jésus Beledou provides a summary of his arguments in Lingala for a broader audience, reiterating the lack of credibility in Tshibangu's 'investigation' and its clear intent to destabilize the country and delegitimize the current administration, accusing Tshibangu of being a 'journalist of laziness' and funded by external parties.

The host concludes by directly accusing Tshibangu of working for Kabila and Nanga, driven by a $100,000 payment from Martin Thibambé, with the aim of creating diversion and discrediting the peace agreements. He challenges Tshibangu to a public debate to address these serious allegations.

The broadcast introduces the controversial 'investigation' by journalist Mills Tshibangu regarding the Konenanga mining square and its alleged theft, which Tshibangu uses to justify Corney Nanga's 'barbaric aggression' in eastern DRC. The hosts question the integrity and motivations behind this so-called investigation.

Dou Jésus Beledou critically analyzes Tshibangu's 'investigation,' highlighting the absence of crucial journalistic principles like cross-referencing sources and obtaining statements from all parties involved, including those accused. Beledou asserts that Tshibangu's approach is biased, merely relaying information from one side without seeking balance, and therefore cannot be considered a legitimate investigation.

The discussion points out Tshibangu's inconsistencies in his narrative and questions the source of his funding, especially given that he allegedly paid other journalists to disseminate his findings. Beledou suggests that these actions indicate a predetermined agenda rather than genuine journalistic inquiry.

The segment unveils alleged connections between Tshibangu's 'investigation' and Joseph Kabila's network. Martin Thibambé, described as Kabila's collaborator and protector of his mining interests, is identified as the financier of Tshibangu's work. The actual motivation for the investigation is revealed: to exonerate Corney Nanga and discredit the current Tshisekedi administration.

Beledou debunks Tshibangu's claims that Minister Lando orchestrated the alleged theft of Nanga's mining square. He clarifies that the problematic 'deals' involving Nanga and the mining company date back to 2017, a period when Lando was not a minister and Tshisekedi was not president. This timeline refutes Tshibangu's attempt to link the current government to Nanga's rebellion through the mining dispute.

The speaker underlines that Nanga's rebellion is orchestrated by Rwandan President Kagame, a fact corroborated by international reports. He argues that Tshibangu’s narrative aims to justify Nanga’s actions by falsely blaming the Tshisekedi government, thereby serving the interests of those who seek to destabilize the DRC.

Beledou reveals that Tshibangu allegedly received $100,000 from Martin Thibambé to conduct his 'campaign,' further exposing the financial motives behind the biased reporting. The objective is to tarnish the image of the DRC and its government, especially after signing agreements with Rwanda under US mediation.