Understanding Quality and Total Quality Management

Share

Summary

This article defines quality, differentiates between quality assurance and control, outlines the key elements of Total Quality Management (TQM), compares modern and traditional views of quality, and discusses TQM implementation in the Malaysian Public Sector.

Understanding Quality and Total Quality Management

Highlights

Concept of Quality
Page 1

Quality is a dynamic state associated with products, services, people, processes, and environments that meets or exceeds expectations and produces superior value. Key definitions include 'fitness for use' (Juran), 'predictable degree of uniformity and dependability at low cost' (Deming), and 'conformance to requirement' (Crosby). Common elements across these definitions highlight meeting customer expectations, application to various organizational components, and its ever-changing nature.

Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Page 2

Quality Assurance (QA) refers to planned and systematic activities providing confidence that products meet quality requirements, focusing on design and process control. It ensures products are compatible with customer needs. Quality Control (QC) focuses on fulfilling quality requirements, often involving actions during or after production, such as warranties. QC systems typically include a standard/goal, a measurement mechanism, and a comparison for corrective action, often contributing to organizational learning.

Total Quality: Definition and Key Elements
Page 3

Total Quality (TQ) is an approach maximizing an organization's competitiveness through continual improvement of products, services, people, processes, and environments, aiming to understand, meet, and exceed customer expectations. Key elements of TQ include a strategically based approach, customer focus (internal and external), an obsession with quality, a scientific approach to decision-making, long-term commitment, teamwork, continual process improvement, education and training, freedom through control, unity of purpose, employee involvement and empowerment, and striving for peak performance.

Modern vs. Traditional Views of Quality
Page 5

There are significant differences between modern and traditional views of quality. Traditionally, productivity and quality were seen as conflicting, quality was defined solely by meeting specifications, measured against an acceptable nonconformance level, achieved through inspection, and defects were expected. Quality was a separate function, employees were blamed for poor quality, and supplier relationships were short-term and cost-driven. In contrast, modern TQ views productivity gains as a result of quality improvements, defines quality as exceeding customer expectations, measures it with high-performance benchmarks and scientific approaches, achieves it through product and process design, prevents defects (aiming for Six Sigma levels), integrates quality throughout the organization, makes managers responsible for quality issues, and fosters long-term, quality-oriented supplier relationships.

Implementation of Quality Management in Malaysia
Page 7

The Malaysian Public Service has implemented quality management through Development Administration Circulars (DACs) since 1991. These circulars have institutionalized programs like the quality control circle (QCC), Client Charter, and total quality management (TQM). The TQM principles, as outlined in DAC 1/1992, include top management support, long-term strategic planning for quality, customer focus, training and recognition, teamwork, performance measurement, and emphasizing quality assurance. These principles are considered universal and adaptable to various government departments.

Recently Summarized Articles

Loading...