Doctrine of Piercing the Veil of Corporate Entity Explained

Share

Summary

This video explains the doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate entity, contrasting it with the doctrine of corporate entity. It clarifies when the separate legal personality of a corporation can be disregarded, primarily in cases of fraud or illegal activity, and provides examples to illustrate its application.

Highlights

Introduction to Piercing the Veil
00:00:21

Attorney Marie Chris Bataan Lasko introduces the doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate entity. She briefly revisits the doctrine of corporate entity, which establishes a corporation as a separate and distinct legal entity from its stockholders or members. The doctrine of piercing the veil, conversely, allows for this separate legal personality to be disregarded.

When is the Corporate Veil Pierced?
00:02:33

The corporate veil is pierced when the corporation is used as a shield for fraud or as a vehicle to perpetrate illegal activities. In such cases, the court can disregard the corporate entity to hold directors or officers civilly or criminally liable for their illegal or fraudulent acts.

Example 1: Defrauding a Creditor
00:03:52

An example is provided where ABC Corporation borrows money from Mr. X. Under the corporate entity doctrine, only ABC Corporation and its assets are liable to Mr. X. However, if the directors fraudulently dissolve ABC Corporation to avoid payment, and transfer assets to a new corporation (XYZ Corporation) owned by the same individuals, Mr. X can ask the court to pierce the veil. This allows Mr. X to pursue the guilty directors or officers of ABC Corporation personally, as the corporation was used to perpetrate fraud.

Example 2: Evading Creditors by Transferring Assets
00:08:39

Another example illustrates Mr. A, an insolvent individual with multiple creditors, who creates a corporation and transfers all his remaining assets to it to defraud his creditors. In this scenario, despite the corporation's separate legal personality, creditors can apply the doctrine of piercing the veil to go after the corporation's assets for Mr. A's debts, as the corporation was established for fraudulent purposes. The burden of proof lies with the creditors to demonstrate the fraudulent intent.

Conclusion and Further Information
00:10:56

The video concludes by reiterating the core concept of piercing the veil, emphasizing its application when a corporation is used for fraudulent schemes. The speaker also mentions that there are other Supreme Court cases applying this doctrine and encourages viewers to check them out. She thanks the viewers and encourages them to like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell for more content.

Recently Summarized Articles

Loading...