Sociological Perspectives on IOs Self-Legitimation

Share

Summary

This paper analyzes the self-legitimation practices of international organizations (IOs), focusing on behavioral responses rather than purely discursive legitimation. It examines how organizations sustain authority, particularly those with limited control mechanisms, and highlights the strategies of the General Assembly and the Security Council in maintaining legitimacy in peace and security.

Sociological Perspectives on IOs Self-Legitimation

Highlights

Diverging from Discursive Legitimation

Recent sociological perspectives emphasize self-legitimation through discourse. This paper, however, shifts focus to behavioral responses and institutional practices as crucial mechanisms for IOs to sustain their authority, moving beyond the idea of legitimacy as a fixed institutional attribute.

Sustaining Authority in IOs

The analysis aims to understand how certain IOs, especially those with limited control, endure over time. It specifically investigates the strategies used by the General Assembly and the Security Council to assert and maintain their legitimacy in matters of peace and security.

Internal Dynamics of Legitimacy

The paper identifies members of the Security Council as the primary internal audience for legitimacy claims. It explores how these bodies express and support their legitimacy through their actions, contributing to a broader understanding of institutional resilience within international governance.

Recently Summarized Articles

Loading...