Summary
Highlights
The video begins by explaining the concept of Angel Trees, run by the Salvation Army, which allow donors to purchase gifts for children in need based on wish lists. It then introduces the recent controversy involving a TikToker, initially known as 'it's Cookie Do', whose Angel Tree shopping video went viral and received a massive backlash. Her original account has since been wiped, but reuploads of her videos exist.
The original video shows 'it's Cookie Do' stating her intention to spend at least $30, which many viewers found problematic as it was the minimum suggested. She struggled to identify items on the list, like 'Baby Alive' and 'Snuggle Sophia,' and considered buying an off-brand doll for $10 that 'covers three ethnicities.' Ultimately, she and her husband decided to buy only one present, with her husband finding the exact doll on the list, but stating the child would only receive that one gift.
The public's reaction to 'it's Cookie Do's' initial video was largely negative. Viewers criticized her for seemingly only buying one gift, aiming for the minimum spend, and her responses to critical comments. Screenshots of comments showed people accusing her of not fulfilling the child's list and referencing her own Amazon wish list for her son. Many expressed frustration at her seeming lack of effort and dismissive attitude.
Other TikTokers, like Nikki Colette and Delila Lynn, created response videos condemning 'it's Cookie Do's' actions. Nikki Colette highlighted her immediate aim for the $30 minimum and criticized her for putting on a show for views while only buying one gift. Delila Lynn suggested that if a donor cannot fulfill a child's list, they should return the ticket for someone else who can.
In her response videos, 'it's Cookie Do' expressed frustration with people jumping to conclusions and criticized the 'true meaning of Christmas.' She showed a screenshot proving she had purchased more items on November 10th, a day before her controversial video was posted. She claimed her husband completed the shopping and asserted that people shouldn't criticize those trying to help, especially if they are not donating themselves.
A particularly controversial part of her response was her statement that if children in need are truly in need, they should be grateful for anything they receive. She added that if they are not grateful, 'that's on them and their upbringing,' drawing on her own experience of growing up poor. This comment ignited further outrage, with many pointing out the insensitivity towards foster children and those with difficult backgrounds.
The comments regarding gratitude and upbringing led to more intense criticism. 'it's Cookie Do' defended her previous statement by asking if someone who received zero gifts last year wouldn't be thankful for any gift this year. She also questioned why she should have to clarify all her donations and why there's a stigma around not buying everything on a list, arguing it discourages donations. She ended by urging viewers not to 'jump the gun' on social media and to be an example by donating more, even providing a link to the Salvation Army.
The video concludes by noting that 'it's Cookie Do's' entire TikTok profile has been wiped, and all videos deleted, leaving her future on the platform uncertain. The host points out that while her original video was posted on November 11th, the major public backlash occurred recently. The host then invites viewers to share their thoughts on whether the backlash was warranted.