Pattern Breakers: How to find a breakthrough startup idea | Mike Maples, Jr. (Partner at Floodgate)
Summary
Highlights
Mike Maples Jr. introduces the three core elements of breakthrough startup ideas: inflections, insights, and founder future-fit, highlighting that business is never a fair fight and startups must wage "asymmetric warfare." He shares the impetus for his book "Pattern Breakers," which arose from discovering that 80% of his biggest investment returns came from pivots, and that successful startups often defied conventional 'best practices.' His research involved meticulously analyzing early pitch decks and discussions with founders to understand the true origin stories and pivotal moments of successful companies.
Maples defines an inflection as an external event that creates the potential for a radical change in human thought, feeling, and action. He emphasizes that inflections are turning points, not gradual improvements. Examples include the iPhone 4S with GPS enabling Lyft, and improved smartphone cameras and broadband penetration facilitating Instagram. Inflections can also be regulatory changes (like telemedicine during COVID-19) or shifts in societal beliefs. He provides stress test questions for identifying true inflections: what specific new thing was introduced, how does it empower specific people in specific ways, and under what conditions might that empowerment be realized or not?
Insights are non-obvious truths discerned by founders that harness one or more inflections to change behavior. Maples stresses that insights must be non-consensus and right to lead to massive success. He uses the example of Lyft (seeing the iPhone 4S's potential for "Airbnb for cars") and Airbnb itself (the non-consensus idea of staying in a stranger's home). He highlights the importance of being surprised in the discovery process, quoting Scott Cook (Intuit) who would ask about the three biggest surprises when evaluating a new product. Founders earn secrets by getting their hands dirty with new technologies and noticing what's missing in the future.
Founder future-fit refers to a founder's unique traits that make them ideally suited to a specific future. This can manifest as young, first-time founders with a "beginner's mind" at the cutting edge of new technology (e.g., Mark Zuckerberg, Mark Andreessen) or experienced industry veterans with deep networks and credibility (e.g., Applied Intuition founders). The core idea is that founders who live in the future, actively notice what's missing, and possess intrinsic motivation and connections in that future are more likely to build successful products and convince others to believe in their vision. This involves building for oneself or for "lighthouse customers" already living in the future.
Maples outlines three actions breakthrough founders take: * **Movements:** Creating a movement leverages the grievance of a minority against the majority, appealing to beliefs and emotions rather than pragmatism. This crystallizes a choice, making early believers emotionally committed (e.g. Lyft's pink mustache, Clarence Birdseye's frozen food, Tesla's sustainable energy mission, Airbnb's 'live like a local'). * **Storytelling:** Founders must effectively communicate their vision. Drawing on the "hero's journey" framework, founders are Obi-Wan, guiding the early adopters (heroes) through the "world that is" to the "world that could be." The story must be tailored to different audiences (investors, employees, customers), showing them how they become heroes in this new future. He cites Steve Jobs's iPhone launch as a masterclass in contrasting the old with the new. * **Disagreeableness:** Breakthrough founders are inherently disagreeable; they disagree with the status quo and are willing to pursue something others deem crazy. This requires courage to be disliked and ignore conventional advice, as exemplified by Elon Musk and even Bill Gates. Messiness and chaos are common in early-stage startups, as they are chaotically moving people towards a different future, rather than executing flawlessly in the present.
Maples emphasizes that applying these principles within larger companies requires a different approach. Pattern-breaking ideas within corporations should be treated as distinct entities, often separated from the main business to avoid the "tractor beam of acting like a pattern-matching corporation." Examples include Apple's iPhone and Amazon's AWS. He highlights that a willingness to fail small, often discreetly, is crucial for achieving breakthrough success, echoing Vinod Khosla's advice to invest a portion of profits into projects likely to fail but with asymmetric upside. Maples concludes by encouraging founders to embrace the loneliness of pursuing non-consensus ideas, emphasizing that sticking to one's beliefs, even when others disagree, is a common trait among successful pattern-breakers.