They KNEW This About Vitamin D (And Ignored It)

Share

Summary

This video exposes a historical "error" in recommended Vitamin D dosages and argues that the continued adherence to these low recommendations is not an oversight but a deliberate act by institutions, potentially influenced by private interests. The video highlights a recalculation suggesting significantly higher daily Vitamin D requirements and discusses the many vital functions of Vitamin D beyond bone health, as well as strategies to optimize intake.

Highlights

The Uncorrected Vitamin D "Cover-Up"
00:00:00

The video begins by discussing a long-standing "error" in vitamin D recommendations, specifically the advised 600 IUs of D3. This wasn't a typo but a systemic error exposed in 2014, yet it remains uncorrected. The initial evaluation of vitamin D relied on study averages rather than individual responses, leading to widespread deficiency. Reanalysis in 2014 found the real number should be around 8,895 IUs, a recalculation confirmed by independent research but largely ignored.

The Institute of Medicine's Role and Bias
00:01:52

The speaker introduces information from the book "Forbidden Facts" about the Institute of Medicine (now National Academy of Medicine), the organization responsible for these recommendations. It's revealed that this private group's primary role is to protect the system and industry, not necessarily to discover the truth. Examples include predetermined outcomes in vaccine-autism investigations, decades of delay in acknowledging Agent Orange toxicity, and covering up asbestos in baby powder. This showcases a pattern of delaying, manipulating evidence, and protecting industry interests over public health, a playbook mirrored in the vitamin D recommendations.

The Broad Importance of Vitamin D and Persistent Misguidance
00:04:03

Vitamin D is crucial for immune regulation, muscle function, brain health, mood, cognitive function, metabolic control, and reduces cancer risk, far beyond just bone health. Despite its extensive importance, doctors continue to follow outdated guidelines of 600 IUs. The speaker emphasizes that the organization didn't just make a mistake; they've doubled down on defending the incorrect number even after being shown the math was wrong. The speaker highlights that the National Academy of Medicine is a private organization that receives funding from the government and private donors, including big food, big pharma, and even opioid manufacturers, which creates a conflict of interest in its recommendations.

Misconceptions About Vitamin D Needs and Toxicity
00:06:40

The video questions the low 600 IU recommendation by illustrating that it's equivalent to only 3 minutes of sun exposure, which is insufficient, especially considering common vitamin D resistance. The speaker explains that blood tests for vitamin D often measure inactive forms, not cellular levels. The advised 20 nanograms per milliliter is deemed inadequate, especially for therapeutic needs like inflammatory conditions, diabetes, obesity, or autoimmune diseases. The speaker suggests a much higher ideal range of 50 to 80 nanograms per milliliter and debunks fears of vitamin D toxicity, stating it's extremely rare and typically requires hundreds of thousands of IUs over months. Strategies to mitigate potential risks, like taking magnesium and vitamin K2, are mentioned.

Why Most Adults are Vitamin D Deficient and Recommendations
00:08:55

The speaker poses the question of why most adults worldwide are vitamin D deficient if the sun provides it and every cell needs it. The answer lies in an "indoor, inflamed, sugar-fed society" that demonizes sun exposure and adheres to insufficient 600 IU recommendations. The video concludes by recommending increased sun exposure, especially in winter or when sun is limited, and supplementing with vitamin D3 alongside vitamin K2 and magnesium. Magnesium is highlighted as essential for vitamin D3's effectiveness.

Recently Summarized Articles

Loading...